« Resign, Just in Time

The Gelflog

Be Afraid. Very Afraid. »

Media

September 21, 2005

Surveying Ivy League Motherhood

Note: This article has been updated. See the end of the post for details.

One likely reason that Louise Story came to the conclusion in her front page New York Times article Tuesday that many Ivy League women would rather be stay-at-home moms than part of the workforce: A skewed sample. She arrives at a conclusion about "women at the nation's most elite colleges" based on spot interviews with students from a few Ivy League schools and then a survey with students at one school: her own. Last school year, Story sent out a 37-question survey to a group of freshman and senior women at Yale University, her (and my) alma mater. While it is indeed possible that 60% of those who replied said "they planned to cut back on work or stop working entirely" when they had kids, as Story writes, it's doubtful that those who replied are representative of all Ivy League women.

Those who did not reply probably included some who were too busy or uninterested to spend the time to fill out the lengthy questionnaire. It definitely included people like Emily Holleman, a current sophomore who says she declined to fill out the survey because she thought it was flawed. "I felt that it was very badly phrased and strongly suggested that ALL women at Yale planned to a) get married and b) have kids. It also assumed that all women at Yale were straight," she told Gelf in an email. "It was relatively clear to me and several of my friends that she was either unable to construct a suitable survey or had already decided what answers she wanted to receive and constructed her survey based on what questions would induce these responses." (Gelf emailed Story to ask about the survey but haven't heard back from her yet. When we do, we'll post an update.)

Holleman passed along a copy of Story's survey. Here are a few loaded questions, most of them placed at the start of the survey:

When you have children, do you plan to stay at home with them or do you plan to continue working? Why?

If you plan to continue working, do you plan to work full-time in an office, or full-time from your house, or part-time in an office, or part-time from your house? Why?

If you plan to stay at home with your kids, do you plan to return to work? If so, how old will you wait for your kids to be when you return?

Was your mom a stay-at-home mom? Explain whether she worked, and how much she worked! Were you glad with her choice (to either work or stay-at-home or whatever combination she did)?

How do you think college-age men at Yale feel about whether wives should stay at home with their kids?

(So we have answers to some of the pointed questions posed by Jack Shafer on Slate about the survey: "But even a social-science dropout wouldn't consider the findings to be anything but anecdotal unless he knew 1) what questions were asked (Story doesn't say), 2) how many questionnaires were distributed, and 3) why freshman and seniors received the questionnaires to the exclusion of sophomores and juniors. Also, 4) a social-science dropout would ask if the Times contaminated its e-mailed survey with leading questions and hence attracted a disproportionate number of respondents who sympathize with the article's underlying and predetermined thesis.")

Salon's Katharine Mieszkowski notes that the Times ran an eerily similar article in its magazine section two years ago that came to the same conclusion. ("Why don't women run the world?" Lisa Belkin asks in the piece. "Maybe it's because they don't want to.") Mieszkowski counters by giving numbers from respected studies stating that more women—not fewer—are entering the workforce and that more families than ever are supported by dual wage earners.

Perhaps those trends don't apply to couples who are privileged enough to support their families with only one income. (And despite my Ivy roots, I tend to believe that an Ivy education is a better marker for wealth than for smarts.) But this dubious article doesn't prove much, besides that the Times should get out of the survey business.

Here's the whole survey:

Name:_____________________

Would you like me to keep your name anonymous?_________ (It is helpful to be able to use names in articles; however, I respect your need for privacy. If you'd like, you could allow me to use your name with most of your answers, but you can indicate in your answers any particular items that I should not associate with your name.)

When you have children, do you plan to stay at home with them or do you plan to continue working? Why?

If you plan to continue working, do you plan to work full-time in an office, or full-time from your house, or part-time in an office, or part-time from your house? Why?

If you plan to stay at home with your kids, do you plan to return to work? If so, how old will you wait for your kids to be when you return?

Was your mom a stay-at-home mom? Explain whether she worked, and how much she worked! Were you glad with her choice (to either work or stay-at-home or whatever combination she did)?

At what age do you think you'll have kids? How many kids do you want?

How certain do you feel that your above answers will represent what you'll feel when you actually have kids?

Since what age have you known the above answers (your plans and desires on whether to stay home with kids)?

Do you think most of your Yale friends feel the same way you do on these issues? If not, how do they feel? How about your non-Yale friends at less selective schools?

Is this something you've talked about with friends?

What have been the biggest factors affecting your opinions in this area?

How old are you and what is your birth date?

Where did you grow up?

What are your parents' occupations?

How many siblings do you have and are you the youngest, oldest or middle child?

What are your hobbies and what are your Yale extra-curriculars?

What is your major or, if you haven't decided, what academic subjects do you like best?

Why did you choose to come to Yale?

What do you think your career will be? (even if it is the career you will have only until you have kids) Do you think you'll attend grad school? If so, what type of grad school?

Are you in a serious relationship now? Have you been in one before?

Would you describe yourself as a feminist?

How do you think college-age men at Yale feel about whether wives should stay at home with their kids?

Any other comments?

Can I follow up with you to interview you on your life and career plans? What is the best way to reach you?

Update:
After Gelf posted the initial piece, we received a second survey from Holleman, which she says arrived in early February, slightly two months after she received the first one. This indicates that perhaps some of the recipients answered the second survey. It is unclear how many of the 138 answered each survey, and how many were sufficiently turned off by the first survey not to answer the second. Gelf still has not heard back from Story about the surveys, but we will update the piece once we do.

Here is the second survey:

Name:_____________________ Class of: ญญญญญญ______

Would you like me to keep your name anonymous?_________

Do you plan to have children? (If not, skip to question #6)

When you have children, do you plan to stay at home with them or do you plan to continue working? Why?

If you plan to continue working, do you plan to work full-time in an office, or full-time from your house, or part-time in an office, or part-time from your house? Why?

If you plan to stay at home with your kids, do you plan to return to work? If so, how old will you wait for your kids to be when you return?

At what age do you think you'll have kids? How many kids do you want?

Was your mom a stay-at-home mom? Explain whether she worked, and how much she worked! Were you glad with her choice (to either work or stay-at-home or whatever combination she did)?

How old are you and what is your birth date? Where did you grow up?

What are your parents' occupations?

How many siblings do you have and are you the youngest, oldest or middle child?

What are your hobbies and what are your Yale extra-curriculars? What is your major or, if you haven't decided, what academic subjects do you like best? What do you think your career will be and will you attend grad school?

What role do you expect your husband will play in your family, if you have kids? Will he work full-time, stay home, etc.?

How are you funding your college education?

Any other comments?







Post a comment

Comment Rules

The following HTML is allowed in comments:
Bold: <b>Text</b>
Italic: <i>Text</i>
Link:
<a href="URL">Text</a>

Comments

- Media
- posted on Sep 21, 05
Kanye West

George Bush doesn't care about black people.

---

- Media
- posted on Sep 21, 05
duckadee

Well, the first question says it all about the author's attitudes--"when you have children". Not if--WHEN. I wouldn't have answered such an insulting questionnaire either, with such a blanket assumption leading it off.

- Media
- posted on Sep 21, 05
gfw

Not only a biased sample, but poorly worded survey questions. That would lead also to poor reliability and validity.

- Media
- posted on Sep 21, 05
Charley Deppner

Another thing to point out is, the price of college has increased so much over the past few years and in part. "Ivy League" colleges, it'd be remised to not mention the type of socio-economic background many of the candidates of this survey are accustomed to and anticipate upon graduating.

For example, chances are likely a comfortable lifestyle amongst Princeton graduates and their spouses can result from a single-income family as well as a dual-income family vs. undergraduates and graduates from a more atypical college experience.

- Media
- posted on Sep 21, 05
lerxst

Many an economist would tell you that what she's picking up (if her anecdotes or surveys are accurate), is a "backward bending supply curve". People at high income levels may prefer more leisure than what they can buy from working more hours.

When the NYT mag article came out a few of us economists were amazed that this article did not bother discussing this vary simple Econ 101 idea.

- Media
- posted on Sep 21, 05
juniper pearl

any woman who did not want children, or even thought that she might but wasn't completely sure, would have discarded this survey without reading past the first three questions, guaranteeing a sample reasonably dedicated to child-rearing. i'm disappointed that an article based on such subjective anti-science would be run in a paper like the nyt.

- Media
- posted on Sep 21, 05
DSL

Still another reason why "stuck on stupid" is likely become an enduring phrase. A Yale student (graduate?) puts together a piece of crap survey and gets it amplified by the New York Times. She probably got an A for her work (who doesn't at Yale these days?). Is it any wonder that our former elites are under attack? It's not their political slant, it's just basic incompetence. Yale and the NYT indeed!

- Media
- posted on Sep 22, 05
Sarah

Glad to see someone picked up on the fact that Louise surveyed people from her alma mater. I was in the same class as Louise at Yale ('03) and I can say that this article is fairly representative of her work (she wrote for the YDN there) - it contains the usual shoddy research, mediocre writing, and plenty of bias. Fortunately, I can also say that there are many people at Yale who are nothing like Louise - while I can't excuse the NYT for hiring her (or Yale for letting her in), please don't let her mediocrity rub off on the rest of us.

In my opinion, the truly horrendous part of the article was Louise's implication that schools should somehow take sex or a person's likelihood to become a stay-at-home mother into account in admissions decisions. This reminds me of an anecdote I heard from a friend: her mother applied to Columbia journalism school, and, at the interview, she was told that she would normally be admitted but they weren't going to let her in because she was a woman. They figured she would just end up a stay-at-home mom. As it turns out, she did become a stay-at-home mom - and a prominent biographer. Seems as though going back to these kinds of admissions decisions would not be a good idea, for women or for the schools that would be missing out on their talent.

-Sarah

PS In reference to DSLs post, As are not as easy to come by at Yale as you might think. I got a solid mix of As and Bs there by working my ass off, then attended graduate school at the University of Kentucky, where I ended up with a 4.0 GPA without working half as hard. I won't deny that educational standards have dipped a bit everywhere, and there certainly are some easy classes at Yale, but compared to an average school Yale was incredibly challenging.

- Media
- posted on Sep 22, 05
'As You Know' Bob

(Hi, I was send over by the link at Atrios)

Wow. That survey would have been flunked at my school's "Theory Construction in the Social Sciences" course. It's not just badly written, it's badly thought through.

"How old are you and what is your birth date?"

Really, now - what is the point of asking for the same information twice? As an internal check that the respondent is telling the truth? Because the researcher is not capable of calculating the age if given the DOB? Because the researcher plans to discard any data with a mismatch here?

Why waste the respondent's time on such a thoughtless duplication of effort? It certainly looks like no serious thought or pretesting went into this "research".

And from this terrible instrument, she gets results that go straight to the front page of the NYT? I don't know if I'm more appalled at Yale's shoddy scholarship, or at the Times' shoddy journalism..

- Media
- posted on Sep 22, 05
Orson

So, Yale women want to be Hausfraus and other Ivy Leaguer's don't. That's the story your peddling?

Granted, the sample is small. But the idea that it's inherently meaningless doesn't pass the smell test. It's too implausible.

Furthermore, the painful wretching among commenters tell me we're in PC-denial land. If we were honest, we'd have honest discussions about male-female differences. But because of PC-religion, we don't becuase we can't listen to alternative opinions.

Plus ca change.

- Media
- posted on Sep 22, 05
Montana

Great critique, great expose, great comments! I am so insulted by that first question on the study, and the rest is not much better. Did this have to go by Yale's human subjects committee? It's so outrageous that something so crappy can make page one of the Times probably through an inside connection…
and of course then the Times' rich Ivy readers (who are the ones mostly emailing articles to each other) make it the number one most emailed article.

To the poster who wrote:
"How old are you and what is your birth date?
Really, now - what is the point of asking for the same information twice? As an internal check that the respondent is telling the truth? Because the researcher is not capable of calculating the age if given the DOB? Because the researcher plans to discard any data with a mismatch here?"

--Maybe she was really trying to ask what their zodiac sign was. It would make sense, given her idea of what scientific methods are.

Montana

- Media
- posted on Sep 23, 05
Tenured Feminist

So which RCs did she select for her sample? And what was the response rate? It would be very easy to get skewed results by picking particular RCs/houses at many Ivy League colleges (for the non-cognoscenti, the preppies congregate together). And without the response rate (and RRs tend to be lower for e-surveys already), we have literally no idea what to make of this data. Did she send out 200 or 2000 e-mails?

Bad, bad work -- shame on her for designing such a poor survey and executing it so badly. But even more shame on the Times for actually publishing it. Breathtakingly stupid all around.

- Media
- posted on Sep 26, 05
Carl

TF, good questions. Last Friday, after some of the criticisms of the study emerged, the NY Times printed the reporter's explanation of her methods here:
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/23/national/23women-sidebar.html
138 of 220 recipients replied, 45 of those to the initial survey that David wrote was flawed, and the rest to modified follow-up surveys (the Times doesn't publish any of these surveys).
She still doesn't say which residential colleges she emailed, but I don't think it matters much; unlike at other schools, Yale's RCs really are assigned randomly to freshmen, and just a handful of students request a transfer.

About Gelflog

The Gelflog brings you all the same sports, media & world coverage you’ve come to love from Gelf Magazine, but shorter and faster. If you’d like, subscribe to the Gelflog feed.

RSSSubscribe to the Gelflog RSS