The website StinkyJournalism.org claims to offer a "unique forum for citizens to publish research on errors they encounter in the media." For the last few days, Rhonda Roland Shearerwho is the founder of the site (and widow of Stephen Jay Gould)has been publishing story after story questioning the veracity of photos of the Monster Pig, supposedly killed by an 11-year old boy from Alabama. But Stinky Journalism has its own malodorous journalism.
While it remains unclear whether any of the photos of the giant wild hog were doctored, it is certain that a blurb on the top of the Stinky Journalism front page is misleading. A prominently placed quote from Slate's media critic Jack Shafer that appears to be giving props to the site is from an article in which he did nothing of the sort.
After Gelf saw that Shafer made no mention of the site in the article featuring the quote, we asked him what he thought of being used in a blurb that might shame even the movie ad folks. Here's part of the resulting email he sent to Stinky Journalism (and forwarded to Gelf): "While I applaud the ambitions of your Web site, the use of my name and quotation at the top of your home page makes it look as if I've endorsed your site in print, which I have not. I would like you to take it down at your earliest convenience."
Incidentally, the banner on the top of Stinky Journalism's homepage touts that the site was a 2005 Webby Worthy Award winner. But the banner links to this page, which doesn't show Stinky Journalism, and searches on the Webbys site for Stinky Journalism, stinky, and stinkyjournalism come up empty.
UPDATE: Shearer updated the link from her banner about the Webby award to point to a copy of this letter she received about the award. Also, here's a Web Archive copy of the page on the Webby site noting Stinky Journalism's selection.
Comment Rules
The following HTML is allowed in comments:
Bold: <b>Text</b>
Italic: <i>Text</i>
Link:
<a href="URL">Text</a>