Gelf Magazine - Looking over the overlooked


June 20, 2008

Insolence is Bliss

Deus Ex Malcontent's Chez Pazienza tells Gelf what it's like to (almost) make a living by being a smartass online.

Adam Rosen

Behold the Smartass, the unflappable thorn-in-your-side, smug beyond compare, a guy who’s stuck it to you if not twice, then at least three—possibly four—times. He’s incisive, preternaturally self-aware, and uses five-syllable words like preternatural. He’s a friend to the underdog and an enemy of the Top Dog. To channel Jeffrey Lebowski (the other Lebowski, not the millionaire), he’s not wrong, he’s just an asshole.*

How else but the above to describe Chez Pazienza, the longtime CNN producer canned in February for dutifully minding a blog entitled Deus ex Malcontent? This is a site, consider, that dismisses summer—usually ranked amongst the best of times—as an occasion for “Michael Bay [to] once again spread his figurative ass-cheeks and unleash a putrid load of cinematic diarrhea on the theater-going public.”

Chez Pazienza
"At some point, more serious news will splinter off, and that audience will go with it. But the age of broadcasting without the sensationalism might be over."

Chez Pazienza

As palatable as this image is, there’s plenty more to swallow down. Pazienza could be accused of many things—his “translation” of the Knut The Polar Bear song includes the lyrics “Knut! Knut! / Strong, proud Aryan bear! / Knut! Knut! / Heil, mein liber herr!”—but he could never be faulted for dumbing us down. In a cyberspace inhabited by commentary such as this, his glued-shut prose and bawdy metaphors provide a deeply appreciated, and hilarious, literary diversion.

Since leaving CNN, Pazienza, 38, has become something of an unintentional standard-bearer for New Media. He blogs prolifically, writes for the Huffington Post and Pajiba, and has just released his memoir, Dead Star Twilight, through his site. Gelf caught up with Pazienza, who riffed on the decline of TV news reportage, why he refuses to overshare, and what he’d like to say to Oprah. (You can hear Pazienza, in addition to Editor Anna Holmes and Hipster Handbook author Robert Lanham, speak at Gelf's free Non-Motivational Speaker Series event on Thursday, June 26, in the Lower East Side.) This interview has been edited for clarity.

Gelf Magazine: First off—why so angry?

Chez Pazienza: I just found out that Battlestar Galactica won't return until 2009. Next question.

GM: Why did you start your blog? When did it start taking off? (I came across it a year and half ago through Fark, which linked to your “Year of the Douchebag” awards).

Image Description

Pazienza: 'M. Night Shyamalan isn't a visionary so much as a megalomaniacal bully.'

CP: A little over two years ago—in April of 2006—I was diagnosed with a pinball-sized tumor in my head. I had a couple months of medical leave all to myself after getting it cut out and I figured I should probably find a better way to pass my time than just sleeping and playing Splinter Cell. A friend of mine had started a blog that I enjoyed reading and I figured if I put together my own it'd keep me busy and, hopefully, help me to keep my brain sharp in the wake of the surgery. I was never arrogant enough to believe that people would want to hear what I had to say, but the site allowed me to hone my writing skills a little, and helped me to rediscover how much I actually enjoyed writing. Drew Curtis from is a friend of mine and so he kindly linked a piece that I wrote, and that brought me a ton of new readers. Then I wrote about getting into a fight with M. Night Shyamalan while he was doing publicity for Lady in the Water, and that brought another round of new readers. It just kind of picked up steam from there. You're right, though, the "Year of the Douchebag" list from January of 2007 really seemed to heighten my exposure. The rest is history—just like my job at CNN.

GM: Do you regret anything you've written?

CP: I got a lot of comments and emails after I got canned from CNN that basically said, "Well buddy, I'll bet you're sorry now, asshole!" Actually, I wasn't, and I'm not. I've written a couple of columns that I've had to take a step back and question whether I was too hard on one person or another. A perfect example was the recent piece about my return to my old workplace at the Time Warner Center. But the only time I've ever really worried about something I said is when I've written about my own life. I'm not Emily Gould—(and I'd like to thank her by the way for fucking it up for the rest of us). I'm not an "oversharer" in the sense that I write about what's going on in my life at any given moment. I honestly don't see why anyone would give a shit about that one way or the other. But I have talked quite a bit about my not-so-sparkling past and attempted to draw some universal themes from that. Writing about that sort of thing has been rough on my wife on occasion though, despite her being the most preternaturally supportive person on the planet.

GM: From what I've read, you're not suing CNN for firing you—which, in this country, means your dissatisfaction is somewhat tempered, for whatever reason. Is it because you feel liberated?

"I really fucking hate people who treat the legal system like it's their own personal ATM whenever they get a raw deal or suffer some kind of accident."
CP: I may miss the steady and secure paycheck, but CNN firing me was the best thing that ever happened to my writing career. Who the hell knew who I was before that? To answer the question though, I actually did think about trying to file a lawsuit but—and no one's gonna believe this—then I remembered that I really fucking hate people who treat the legal system like it’s their own personal ATM whenever they get a raw deal or suffer some kind of accident. I'm not Mr. Principled or anything, but the stuff I put out there on the blog and at HuffPo and so on requires me to stand by the convictions I've set for myself—no matter how stupid and self-destructive they may be. This is why I haven't given in and just opted to try to get a job at Fox News Channel, even though Shepard Smith's an old poker buddy of mine. Although if I don't start making some decent money soon, who the hell knows. My ideals aren't gonna feed my new baby, you know?

GM: Did your Huffington Post gig arise as a result of your firing?

CP: Actually, I think it was the other way around. The Huffington people found me and enlisted me to contribute to the site, and it wasn't long after that I got called into my boss's office and told that someone had discovered my name attached to some "controversial" blog posts on the internet. I was out of a job 24 hours later. CNN never mentioned my stuff on HuffPo, only my own site, but for whatever reason, a lot of people seem to think that my Huffington Post piece defending David Shuster for the whole "pimping out" Chelsea Clinton comment was what got their attention.

GM: How does the sensationalism of TV news today compare to when you started out? Is it impossible to imagine a reversal of this trend? There's currently a headline on that reads "Women Gets Life After Cutting Fetus From Friend". It seems like everybody complains about this, to no avail.

CP: Maybe I'm now trying to redeem myself for the sins of my past, but it's funny that I bitch so incessantly about the direction TV news has gone in, considering that I started out at WSVN in Miami in the early 90s. WSVN basically invented the Fox News style—that whole over-produced, high-graphics, whiz-bang thing—and at the time, I was one of the very willing architects behind it. I was a kid who was essentially hired because he didn't have any preconceived J-school notions about what TV news was supposed to look like. Despite all the crap that WSVN caught, both locally and nationally, I really didn't feel like the station's style was hurting anyone. But when you take that kind of attitude—the dazzle them with brilliance and baffle them with bullshit ethos—and suddenly incorporate important subjects like U.S. politics into it, the result is positively toxic. At some point, more serious news will splinter off and sprout up somewhere else, and that audience will go with it. But the age of broadcasting without the sensationalism or the scare-tactics—as opposed to narrowcasting—I think that might be over.

GM: Why did you release your memoir right now? How long had you been working on it for, and how’s it doing?

CP: I started putting Dead Star Twilight together about three years ago, took a break for several months, then sat my ass back down and decided to finish it. While I can't say that I'm proud of the personal behavior I've documented in it, I am proud to have finally put it all down and gotten it out there. I decided to go with an online release after getting fired from CNN. I figured I was suddenly getting a ton of free publicity that might actually translate into sales for the book, since I was netting upwards of 45,000 hits a day right after word of my firing got around. I also kind of wanted to put my money where my mouth was. Right after I got canned, I wrote a long piece that HuffPo published basically decrying the way old media looked at new media. I was loudly proclaiming how strongly I believed in the power of new media, and by releasing Dead Star Twilight via my site, I had a way of proving I was sincere in my convictions.
All the reviews I've seen have been positive and Arianna Huffington was kind enough to read it and give me a blurb. She called it "the book A Million Little Pieces dreamed of being"—which now that I think about it could mean nothing more than that it's a true story. It's sold very well so far, but I won't rest until Oprah picks it for her book club and I can tell her on national television to shove it up her self-obsessed ass. Really—I'll do that. Buy a thousand copies for your friends, make it a huge success and watch me.

"When you take that kind of attitude—the dazzle them with brilliance and baffle them with bullshit ethos—and suddenly incorporate important subjects like U.S. politics into it, the result is positively toxic."
GM: One of the things Deus ex Malcontent does best is skewering celebrity, or at least the culture surrounding it. (See: Bride and Prejudice). As your blog continues to grow in popularity and acclaim, are you afraid of becoming like those you so gleefully cut down?

CP: Oh, trust me, I've got a hell of a long way to go before I have to start worrying about that. I'm not in danger of turning into Oprah anytime soon—or even that idiot Perez Hilton for that matter. I hate to borrow a tired joke, but being a really successful blogger is like being the toughest guy in the Kathy Griffin fan club—which Perez Hilton may be, incidentally. By firing me, CNN definitely increased my notoriety in certain circles, and I kind of owe them for that—thanks guys. But I haven't even risen to the level of "Blowhard TV Pundit" yet, so let's not get ahead of ourselves.

GM: What does the media landscape look like in five years?

CP: A post-apocalyptic desert, where roving clans of bloodthirsty savages battle for control of the world's one remaining resource—face-time—and where a lone stranger, fresh from out of the wasteland, is the only hope for the survival of mankind.
And that stranger is Larry King.

*Intro was shamelessly ripped/adapted from an Atlantic Monthly article on the Angriest Man In Television, though we're not so sure it's David Simon.

Adam Rosen

Adam Rosen is a contributing editor of Gelf, and host of the Non-Motivational Speaker Series.

Post a comment

Comment Rules

The following HTML is allowed in comments:
Bold: <b>Text</b>
Italic: <i>Text</i>
<a href="URL">Text</a>


- Media
- posted on Jun 24, 08

So Chez is a hipster doofus cuntsack.

What a surprise that is.


I guess the most hypocritical thing is that instead of y'know actually trying to do something about the alleged shitty state of broadcast journalism, Chez just sits on the sidelines and jacks off his 1/2" cock, much like the Christians and other types did when the NAzis were going after the Jews in WWII.

Both pathetically sad and sadly pathetic, that's Chez in a nutshell.

- Media
- posted on Jun 24, 08
David Goldenberg

As Jemele Hill notes, Nazi references are best left for references to Nazis. And Cartman.

- Media
- posted on Jun 25, 08


We all know Chez is quite full of himself, not unlike any other blog writer he acts like he knows best. So?

What should he do instead of shaking his sometimes verbose fist on the sidelines?

- Media
- posted on Jun 25, 08

Godwin's law in immediate effect.

Ben ... get over it. Go blow Fox or something.

Article by Adam Rosen

Adam Rosen is a contributing editor of Gelf, and host of the Non-Motivational Speaker Series.

Learn more about this author


Hate to miss out? Enter your email for occasional Gelf news flashes.


Gelf t-shirt

The picture is on the front of the shirt, the words are on the back. You can be in between.